01 Describe the process
0 chars · 0 clauses
⌘↵ to run
02 Clarification queue
✓ Answers on record
Self-reflection execution log
IDLE
Every line is measured, not simulated. The six passes are deterministic rule modules
over the compiled graph — timings come from performance.now(). No learned policy runs here.
Start / End
Decision
Human task
Notification
System call
Audit write
Terminate
This is a walk-through, not a real run. The simulator follows the arrows in the
diagram using the values you type. It does not call Snowflake, send an email, or create anything
anywhere — no system is contacted at any point. It shows you which path your numbers take, so you
can check the logic matches your policy before anyone builds it.
Reading this table. Rows marked clarification did not come from your sentence — they exist because you answered a question. Rows marked structure are merge points and end events the compiler adds to keep the graph well-formed.
No confidence score is shown, deliberately. The engine reports which of its checks
passed and which did not. It does not report a percentage likelihood that the workflow is correct,
because that number has never been measured against a labelled set of human-verified workflows.
A rule either fired or it did not — see
docs/limitations.md.
What this ledger does and does not prove. Each entry commits to the hash of the one
before it, so altering history breaks every subsequent link and Verify chain names the first
broken entry. The ledger exposes append and read only — there is no update or delete path in the code.
It is not tamper-proof: it lives in this browser tab, and anyone who can run JavaScript here
can build a fresh chain that verifies cleanly. Real immutability requires anchoring the head somewhere
the writer does not control — a WORM bucket, an append-only table with no DELETE grant, or a notary.
That is out of MVP scope.